320kbps vs flac reddit

Для ботов

320kbps vs FLAC – Which is Better and How to Convert them to each other?
320 bitrate vs FLAC (distinguishable differences)?
Subscribe to RSS
Solved: MP3 (320KBPS) Or MP3 (VBR)
Subscribe to RSS

320kbps vs FLAC – Which is Better and How to Convert them to each other?

This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register. By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies. Forums New posts Search forums. Articles New articles New comments Series Search articles. Log in Register. Search titles only. Search Advanced search…. New posts. Search forums. Log in. Latest Thread Images. MP3 vs. JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding. Thread starter Aerosheet Start date Mar 1, Post 1 of Aerosheet New Head-Fier. Joined Feb 17, Messages 31 Reaction score Joined Feb 17, Posts 31 Likes Sure, kbps and kbps audio files are missing some frequencies compared to FLAC files, but why should even kbps files be below FLAC formats if there isn't a difference in sound quality? Share This Post. Mar 1, Post 2 of Binge Head-Fier. Joined Nov 13, Messages 79 Reaction score Joined Nov 13, Posts 79 Likes I believe it comes down to nuance in sound. Theres a lot of sound which is beyond the scope of requiring such detail that compressed, lossless, formats can provide. If you find a record where the flac sounds better than the MP3 you will know it, and you will recognize it for that level of detail. Post 3 of PurpleAngel Headphoneus Supremus. Mar 2, Post 4 of RebelRising Head-Fier.

320 bitrate vs FLAC (distinguishable differences)?

My name is Jason and Good Sound Quality means a lot for me. Today we are going to discuss the differences between 2 popular music formats: FLAC vs. Our aim is to make sure that when you finish reading this article you have a clear idea about these music formats and their features. And your next step will be to choose the one which suits you best! In simple words, they mean that some of the data is lost in MP3 file because it is a lossy format, whereas there are no losses for FLAC. We are talking about compression rates for MP3 files vs. FLAC files here. MP3 creators decided to take away some of the sounds, which cannot be heard by the majority of the people and make the file smaller. However, some of the quality was lost during that process. On the contrary, since there is no information being lost during compression, FLAC has the original quality, even after compression. FLAC vs. MP3, in terms of quality, always wins. Does it mean that better quality leads to a better sound? Yes and no. The thing is that, yes, there is a very clear difference in the sound when one listens to FLAC files. But this applies only when they are using good headphones and an appropriate sound system. But they are so deeply mistaken. As you can see, it can be very hard to distinguish between these two formats if you are not using good headphones and sound system. Download it here. It depends on what kind of person you are and what are the devices that you are using. For example, if you just want to listen to your favourite music and do not have any super sound system at home — it does not make any sense for you to buy FLAC files.

Subscribe to RSS

This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register. By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies. Forums New posts Search forums. Articles New articles New comments Series Search articles. Log in Register. Search titles only. Search Advanced search…. New posts. Search forums. Log in. Latest Thread Images. JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding. Thread starter christian u Start date May 26, Post 1 of Joined Mar 21, Messages Reaction score Joined Mar 21, Posts Likes If anybody want to set up their own test, these excellent recorded files are recommended. Free Tracks Format Comparison Here is a zip file containing samples of 2 tracks in 4 different formats. When you compare the files start with the lowest resolution: D MP3 kbps and move on up through example C and B ending with A. Be careful: If you start with A, and move down through B and C ending with D, your mind will remember the ''Blueprint'' of the higher resolution file, making it difficult to hear the difference even when finally listening to the MP3 file. Don't be frustrated if you can't hear a difference at first. Hearing is as individual as taste but hearing is also something which can be acquired, like the taste of good wine. Share This Post. May 26, Post 2 of Joined May 7, Messages Reaction score Joined May 7, Posts Likes Jeez, I just tried these with my different headphones. With the HD and D it was more obvious due to the delivery differences of the lower frequencies. But on my cheaper cans from the HD downwards it was more guess work than factual. May 27, Post 3 of

Solved: MP3 (320KBPS) Or MP3 (VBR)

Forums New posts Search forums. E-Books E-Books Quicklinks. Get our latest product reviews and AV stories emailed to you weekly Subscribe. Product Reviews Loudspeakers Quicklinks. Electronics Quicklinks. AV Accessory Quicklinks. Buying Guides Quicklinks. Join us on Facebook Here. What's new New posts Latest activity. Log in Register. Search titles only. Search Advanced search…. New posts. Search forums. Log in. JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding. Hide sidebar Show sidebar. Thread starter andurilnarsil1 Start date Jan 6, HI all, Newbie here. Should I be able to hear a noticeable improvement in audio quality when listening to flac music files vs bitrate?

Subscribe to RSS

By using our site, you acknowledge that you have read and understand our Cookie PolicyPrivacy Policyand our Terms of Service. Sound Design Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for sound engineers, producers, editors, and enthusiasts. It only takes a minute to sign up. I saw plenty of discussions about Kbps MP3 vs. FLAC on Internet but none with reliable source. Are there any scientific studies e. Well, the thing I found requiring surprisingly large MP3 bit rates was encoding my accordion's tremolo registers. Imagine three reeds sounding with lots of harmonics, almost equal volume, and slightly different pitches, hand-tuned so that all of the respective slow beatings combine into a pleasant sound. At any rate, a high quality recording of something played slowly with that sound reencoded at kbs does not sound "slightly lower quality, discernible by experts" but totally awfully crappy. Like coal grain microphone crappy. With kbs, you start getting tolerable. So this kind of thing caught me on the wrong foot. As a rule, I'd stay away from any lossy encoding until you are finished mastering and listening. You never really know what kind of actually-not-all-that-relevant audio component will end up hogging the bitrate. Some music styles might be less touchy here. I think it is mostly the high frequency content: in my case it was getting too unmusical, but it is similarly distracting when fine-grained noise like a hihat is getting too musical, having discernible and wobbling tones in the noise actually, "musical noise" is a well-known compression artifact. The biggest problem of MP3, and people keep ignoring this as if it really doesn't matter, is that it smears transients. The same math is used to reconstruct the entire frame. Come transient time snares, percussion, hihats, etc that loss of data shows and what may be a beautifully crunchy attack is sacrificed because the encoder math optimised the data to cover the entire frame's needs, not necessarily those few important milliseconds. I've never found audible difference between kbit and kbit mp3. As long as mpeg audio is a bunch of matrices through which data is passed back and forth, adjusting the bitrate primarily affects how much data you're going to discard at the entry point. If your ears can't detect this, stick with MP3. If they can, go for FLAC. To answer your question:. Some sounds compress better than others. Sine waves are great. Accordions are often used in reference material as they get pretty bad with MP3. For me, the worst of the compression artifacts comes from smearing in the cymbals and other percussion. Timing gets off a bit because the frame size is so large. I also find brass in MP3 particularly bad. Yes, many. Check out the references section on the Wikipedia page FLAC as its clear is : Free Lossless Audio Codecthat means the compression applied on the sound file does not affect on the sound quality While there are a lot of good answers here, I got the impression that you are talking about whether there's really a difference between kbps Mp3s and. No one's really said anything about that situation and I happen to have quite a bit of personal experience with that as I've been "spinning" mp3s since Final Scratch first came out. I also know quite a bit about sound, recording and the like, so I'm gonna put in my two cents. In a nutshell, my opinion on the matter is that, for DJing, there is no difference in playing a flac or an mp3.

320kbps vs flac reddit