320kbps vs flac reddit

Subscribe to RSS

As the result of a series of collations, summary work on the customer feedback from our support team, it seems a necessity to give a comprehensive explanation on MP3 kbps vs FLACwhich is a stranger to the most — despite the giant amount of the audiophiles. MP3 — A coding format for digital audio, always have been and will continue to be popular worldwide as the result of its small size and acceptable fidelity. Second, be aware, MP3 is a lossy compression. When compressing, MP3 filters and abandons the data that is not likely to be noticed by human ears. When you unpack the ZIP afterward, it would be much sweeter if none of your sidekicks were missing, right? Thus, it goes without saying that FLAC is of high compression ratio. In short, there is a factor worth considering — compression. That leads to the fact that FLAC has better quality and MP3 has better online transfer performance and less space occupation due to its small size. As for audio file kbps, the highest bit rate of MP3 format, the best setting value of a high-end MP3 player, is the best audio quality of MP3 format so far. As the matter of fact, whether using spectrum analysis software Adobe Audition, Cool Edit Pro or high-end audio equipment to compare these two, we can only find some subtle differences — we can never tell which is which precisely. Although, to be fair, under ideal circumstances, there are still some Matt Murdock who can actually tell the difference between kbps and FLAC. Like kbps vs cd quality? On the other hand, you can properly recompress FLAC files to kbps MP3 format, it's worth noting that if you want to manage the job with all audio data preserved perfectly, a professional audio file compressor is a must. Now, I will show you how to operate it correctly. Before start, please free download free download the software. I hope so. Free Download. Recommended by the author. FAQ 1. FAQ 2. Part 3. Part 1. A: MP3 — A coding format for digital audio, always have been and will continue to be popular worldwide as the result of its small size and acceptable fidelity. Q: What is kbps MP3, kbps meaning? Part 2. Q: kbps mp3 vs. A: FLAC bitrate is usually at around kbps. A: - The data loss during audio file compression is irreversible. Thank you for your reading. All Rights Reserved.

320kbps vs FLAC?

By using our site, you acknowledge that you have read and understand our Cookie PolicyPrivacy Policyand our Terms of Service. Sound Design Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for sound engineers, producers, editors, and enthusiasts. It only takes a minute to sign up. I saw plenty of discussions about Kbps MP3 vs. FLAC on Internet but none with reliable source. Are there any scientific studies e. Well, the thing I found requiring surprisingly large MP3 bit rates was encoding my accordion's tremolo registers. Imagine three reeds sounding with lots of harmonics, almost equal volume, and slightly different pitches, hand-tuned so that all of the respective slow beatings combine into a pleasant sound. At any rate, a high quality recording of something played slowly with that sound reencoded at kbs does not sound "slightly lower quality, discernible by experts" but totally awfully crappy. Like coal grain microphone crappy. With kbs, you start getting tolerable. So this kind of thing caught me on the wrong foot. As a rule, I'd stay away from any lossy encoding until you are finished mastering and listening. You never really know what kind of actually-not-all-that-relevant audio component will end up hogging the bitrate. Some music styles might be less touchy here. I think it is mostly the high frequency content: in my case it was getting too unmusical, but it is similarly distracting when fine-grained noise like a hihat is getting too musical, having discernible and wobbling tones in the noise actually, "musical noise" is a well-known compression artifact. The biggest problem of MP3, and people keep ignoring this as if it really doesn't matter, is that it smears transients. The same math is used to reconstruct the entire frame. Come transient time snares, percussion, hihats, etc that loss of data shows and what may be a beautifully crunchy attack is sacrificed because the encoder math optimised the data to cover the entire frame's needs, not necessarily those few important milliseconds. I've never found audible difference between kbit and kbit mp3. As long as mpeg audio is a bunch of matrices through which data is passed back and forth, adjusting the bitrate primarily affects how much data you're going to discard at the entry point. If your ears can't detect this, stick with MP3. If they can, go for FLAC. To answer your question:. Some sounds compress better than others. Sine waves are great. Accordions are often used in reference material as they get pretty bad with MP3. For me, the worst of the compression artifacts comes from smearing in the cymbals and other percussion.

320 bitrate vs FLAC (distinguishable differences)?

Discussion in ' Multimedia ' started by TW. Are you looking for the solution to your computer problem? Join our site today to ask your question. This site is completely free -- paid for by advertisers and donations. If you're not already familiar with forums, watch our Welcome Guide to get started. Join overother people just like you! Log in or Sign up. Tech Support Guy. Computer problem? Tech Support Guy is completely free -- paid for by advertisers and donations. Click here to join today! Joined: Dec 29, Messages: Hello, For audio that I store on my computer, I want the best quality audio files, and I don't care what the file-size is. So, with that in mind, should the files be converted with a constant bit-rate of KBPS or a variable bit-rate? Which format of conversation would guarantee me the best possible audio quality? Any tips or help would be greatly appreciated! Joined: Sep 23, Messages: Joined: Oct 1, Messages: 5, True, at constant or variable centered aroundno difference. Even at you have to have golden ears that few of us possess to tell the difference. I've seen a couple of tests with renowned and self-appointed audiophile experts and overall they failed to tell the difference between a variable I think, might have been and so you have it covered by far. Joined: Jan 16, Messages: 5, As already mentioned you have to have both good ears and good equipment to notice the improvement with higher bit rates. DarqueMistFeb 6, Joined: Feb 6, Messages: 8. I can agree, that starting with theit doesn't make a big difference- if it is or or On the other hand, i still don't have the reasonable answer for question- which type cbr or vbr is a better choice. Personally i use cbr encoding- but i can't give any proof that it's better. Thanks very much for the tips, everyone! Joined: Mar 30, Messages: 4, MysticEyesFeb 7, What are you trying to do, are you archiving files? This way, you can convert the FLAC file to different lossy formats, at different bit rates at a latter time. Thus, if you want to store many files on a portable player, you can convert the FLAC files to kbps or if you want to stream to your audio receiver you can make files at a higher bit rate. You don't want to convert files to different bit rates using a lossy format, such as MP3, you want to work with a lossless file such as FLAC. I was looking at using FLAC as suggested, but according to the website, that format is not supported with iTunes, which is the music player I prefer to use. Again, need to know what you are trying to accomplish. If its simply to playback on iTunes, just rip in MP3. Its quick, its simple and its takes up much less space than FLAC files.

Subscribe to RSS

This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register. By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies. Forums New posts Search forums. Articles New articles New comments Series Search articles. Log in Register. Search titles only. Search Advanced search…. New posts. Search forums. Log in. Latest Thread Images. JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding. Thread starter christian u Start date May 26, Post 1 of Joined Mar 21, Messages Reaction score Joined Mar 21, Posts Likes If anybody want to set up their own test, these excellent recorded files are recommended. Free Tracks Format Comparison Here is a zip file containing samples of 2 tracks in 4 different formats. When you compare the files start with the lowest resolution: D MP3 kbps and move on up through example C and B ending with A. Be careful: If you start with A, and move down through B and C ending with D, your mind will remember the ''Blueprint'' of the higher resolution file, making it difficult to hear the difference even when finally listening to the MP3 file. Don't be frustrated if you can't hear a difference at first. Hearing is as individual as taste but hearing is also something which can be acquired, like the taste of good wine. Share This Post. May 26, Post 2 of Joined May 7, Messages Reaction score Joined May 7, Posts Likes Jeez, I just tried these with my different headphones. With the HD and D it was more obvious due to the delivery differences of the lower frequencies.

320kbps vs FLAC – Which is Better and How to Convert them to each other?

Forums New posts Search forums. E-Books E-Books Quicklinks. Get our latest product reviews and AV stories emailed to you weekly Subscribe. Product Reviews Loudspeakers Quicklinks. Electronics Quicklinks. AV Accessory Quicklinks. Buying Guides Quicklinks. Join us on Facebook Here. What's new New posts Latest activity. Log in Register. Search titles only. Search Advanced search…. New posts. Search forums. Log in. JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding. Hide sidebar Show sidebar. Thread starter andurilnarsil1 Start date Jan 6, HI all, Newbie here. Should I be able to hear a noticeable improvement in audio quality when listening to flac music files vs bitrate? Some peeps say no, while others say it depends on how good my hearing is, and the quality of my audio equipment. So, my hearing is pretty good, and I generally notice subtle differences in sound quality. Is there a definitive answer on this? Seems like it's one of those touchy subjects for audio community. BoredSysAdmin Audioholic Overlord. I would more likely call them unnecessary bright and definitely not very neutral. If you can't yet afford real reference speakers, you might want to consider getting near reference headphones - this would be much more affordable. You should do forums search. We'd raised this exact subject time and time again. And why this is an issue? Both bandwidth and storage had gotten exponentially better in few years. If you constrained for space on mobile device or car audio - go ahead and use lossy compressed files - you won't hear any difference, but do keep lossless FLACs around - as on really good speakers and good recorded music you will hear difference clearly.

FLAC vs. MP3 - Head to Head

Comments on “320kbps vs flac reddit

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes:

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>